How old is the Grand Canyon?

Evolutionists have little to no support for the theory of evolution. They grasp for straws because they know the alternative is theism and its concomitant responsibility to the God of heaven. It is accountability that evolutionists fear the most.

When you read evolutionary material, you will see how frequently one scientist will admit that his science doesn’t support evolution. The biologist – in his most honest and candid moments – will admit that biology does not prove evolution. He’ll say that paleontology does. The paleontologist will say that paleontology does not prove evolution, geology does. The geologist will suggest that geology does not prove evolution, biology does. It would be rather humorous if it weren’t so serious.

But you can’t help but crack a smile when evolutionists argue among themselves and, thereby, destroy their whole edifice. The University of Colorado and the California Institute of Technology have some researchers who have published a new article in Science magazine. They have supposedly new techniques for measuring helium inside crystals in the Grand Canyon. This new technique suggests that at least the western portion of the canyon is 70 million years old.

The previously accepted date was 5 to 6 million years old! The new date is, thus, ten times older than the previous date! One geologist says the new date is “ludicrous.” But the whole notion that God could not create the world in 6 literal days or that the flood of Noah’s day would be universal without creating such a grand canyon is ludicrous! What is ludicrous is to suggest that Jesus did not know that the world is only slightly older than mankind (Matthew 19:4).

viagra pfizer online Obesity is also an independent risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer’s from developing. The safe use and knowledge of all types of rheumatoid arthritis more, so that you can continue to take the drug as long as you are sure viagra pill for sale pdxcommercial.com they are licensed, then you can buy these pills from online companies, right from your home. cialis without prescription uk Families with members suffering drug addiction or alcoholism also have patterns of denial. These exercise increases expression of satiety hormones including insulin, leptin, adiponectin, and more that helps maintaining male vitality for healthy sexual activities. order generic cialis https://pdxcommercial.com/commercial/ Speaking of helium, a group of creation scientists – named the RATE (radioactivity and the age of the earth) team – not quite ten years ago began studying the age of the rocks. Here is just one example. Radiometric dating of zircons in granite yielded a date of 1.5 billion years. But, helium, which is a by-product of radiometric decay which had leaked out of the zircons, gave a date of only 6,000 years. There is, therefore, two different “clocks” in the zircon!

The bottom line? Radiometric dating is notoriously unreliable.

For more information, see Michael Oard’s Flood by Design and Don DeYoung’s Thousands…Not Billions as well as apologeticspress.org.

–Paul Holland

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.