A basic tenet of premillennial theory is that certain land promises that God made to Abraham have not been fulfilled. Since God made these promises, and He cannot lie, then there must be some future time when Abraham’s descendants – as a physical nation – will receive all of the, land that was originally intended. What does the Bible say?
“The Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying: To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates” (Gen. 15:18). A study of the conquest of the promised land in Joshua’s day causes some to say that not all of this land was occupied by the Israelites.
However, in Joshua 21:43-45 we read: “So the Lord gave to Israel all the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they took possession of it and dwelt in it … Not a word failed of any good thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel. All came to pass.” Joshua repeated the same thing in his final address to the people: “Not one thing has failed of all the good things which the Lord your God spoke concerning you. All have come to pass for you, and not one word of them has failed” (Josh. 23:14).
Note two things:
Clearly, whether a man wants to risk these issues in a very compassionate manner and also maintains privacy and prevents the patient from the embarrassing moments. cialis in india price The only sildenafil super thing that mattered was that the learner should be at least 16 years of age. A healthy sex levitra uk leads to a healthy and happy life. The reason later on was detected best prices cialis davidfraymusic.com as to why people have this particular disorder in their life. 1 – Joshua, who was most qualified to speak on this matter, felt that God’s promises had been kept.
2 – We should observe that the Israelites themselves failed to fully conquer all the native people (see Judges 1 & 2). This brought a curse upon them (2:3) and may have contributed to the notion that the land was not completely occupied.
The conclusion is NO, there are no unfulfilled land promises. Therefore, the argument that a still future, physical kingdom of the Lord is required for the fulfillment of these promises is not valid.
– by Greg Gwin
