Archaeology and the Resurrection of Christ

The resurrection of Christ is the foundation stone of Christianity; if that event did not occur, then both our preaching and faith is vain (I Cor. 15:14). If any fact of antiquity is provable, surely the resurrection of Jesus is. The great classical scholar, Thomas Arnold, who served as Professor of Modern History at Oxford in the 1800s (GWB), once called the Lord’s resurrection the “best-attested fact in human history.” There is a good possibility that archaeology has further strengthened the already unassailable case for the resurrection event.

In 1930 historian Michel Rostovtzeff discovered the “Nazareth Decree.” This stone slab, containing some twenty lines of Greek, was set up in the city of Nazareth by Claudius Caesar, in all probability sometime shortly before 50 A.D. The inscription states anyone apprehended transferring corpses to other places or displacing “the sealing or other stones” is to be put on trial; if found guilty the person is to be executed. How does this relate to the Lord’s resurrection?

Archaeologist E. M. Blaiklock pieces it together this way. The early Christians must have been preaching in Rome by the early forties of the 1st century. Naturally, the resurrection would be central to their message. Jewish enemies of Christianity would counter with the story that Christ’s disciples stole the body (Mt. 28:13). Possibly irritated by this controversy, Claudius “commanded all the Jews to depart from Rome” (Acts 18:2). After further investigation of the matter, during which he learned that Christ (called “Chrestos” by the Roman historian Suetonius) was a native of Nazareth (Mt. 2:23), it is likely that the emperor authorized a decree to be erected (for emphasis in Jesus’ hometown) making body-stealing a capital crime and thus hoping to prevent other religions from arising upon the basis of such stories. If this line of reasoning is correct, and it is highly probable, we have here the first secular testimony to the resurrection of Christ.

Wayne Jackson, Christian Courier vol. 12 No. 4 August 1976

Three Crosses

There were three men who died on the hill of Calvery (place of the skull), the day Jesus died. Jesus died for sin so that all people can be saved. The two thieves were insulting Jesus (Matthew 27:44), but one repented (Luke 23:39-43), thus, he died to sin, meaning he wasn’t going to live a life of sin any longer. The third man did not repent and thus died in sin, and thus was going to be lost eternally.

Everyone today falls into one of the two categories of the thieves – each person has either died to sin, giving his life to Jesus and no longer living a life of sin or one is still living in sin which will ultimately cause Christ to say in the day of judgment, “depart from me…these will go away into eternal punishment” (Matthew 25:41, 46).

Christ died for sin for all, but He lets each decide his relationship to sin. Have you died to sin or are you still living in sin?

Wayne Burger

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.