THE REAL THING

Several years ago the senior citizens in the congregation where I was preaching took a trip to a nuclear reactor nearby. One of the ladies brought me a sample packet of a “pellet of uranium” used in nuclear reactors which she obtained during the tour. Of course it was only simulated, as might be expected. The pellet was not much larger than a Tylenol tablet, and according to the statistics on the package, one pellet of uranium, which costs $5, provides as much energy as 149 gallons of oil, 1,780 pounds of coal, or 157 gallons of regular gasoline. It is not my purpose right here to argue for the advantages and/or disadvantages of nuclear over fossil fuel energy. It is the incredible power contained in that tiny pellet that is so striking.

As I considered this little pellet with such lethal punch, I was reminded of the words of Paul: “I am not ashamed of the gospel: for it is the power of God unto salvation” (Romans 1:16). As I held this “Simulated Uranium Pellet” in my hand, I was aware that this particular pellet was actually useless insofar as providing any power.  It was interesting to look at, it was neatly packaged, and it probably looks a lot like the real thing. BUT IT HAS NO POWER! So it is with “simulated” gospels (Paul calls them perverted, or “different”). Compared to “sound doctrine,” they are neatly packaged, they are interesting to look at, and in many ways, they are similar to the REAL THING. But friends, ONLY THE GOSPEL has the power to save. All facsimiles and simulations are of no value whatsoever when it comes to meeting the needs of the soul.

by Tom Wacaster
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on THE REAL THING

“Walk in the Way of Integrity” Proverbs 10:9

My homeroom teacher had a poster on her wall that said, “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember what you said.” One lie often leads to more lies, as the offender seeks to cover his or her tracks. People lie for many reasons:

  • They don’t want to offend.

I love your new hairdo.

  • They stand to gain financially.

It still runs like new!

  • They hope to entrap or ensnare.

One time won’t hurt.

  • They want to avoid confrontation.

I didn’t see what happened.

  • They get a thrill from getting “one over” on others.

People also lie to cover their tracks. Solomon hints at this in Proverbs 10:9, “Whoever walks in integrity walks securely, but he who makes his ways crooked will be found out.” The latter part of the verse implies that the man lacking integrity tries to hide his misdeeds. Solomon knows, at one point or another, the truth will come out.

I can’t help but think of David here (see 2 Samuel 11–12). Though he had a heart that sought God, in his sin with Bathsheba, David lacked integrity. He tried to cover his tracks; first, by trying to send Uriah home, then by murdering him when he refused to go. David had the opportunity to repent at the words of Nathan the prophet. Yet, terrible consequences followed his sins.

The way of integrity is much easier than the way of sinning and lying to cover it up! The person of integrity doesn’t have to worry if someone is observing them when they don’t know it. The person of integrity doesn’t have to blush when answering questions about where they’ve been or what they’ve been doing. Doing the right thing when “nobody is watching” (an impossibility, since God is always watching, Proverbs 15:3) has countless benefits. Walk in the way of integrity, Solomon says, and your steps will be secure.

Clay Leonard

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “Walk in the Way of Integrity” Proverbs 10:9

THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACHING:

In Matthew 19, when Jesus was asked about marriage and divorce, He quoted from God’s law in the book of Genesis and Jesus defines for us what God has always intended relative to marriage (19:4-6).

Now, some people say, “Well, Jesus did not speak against homosexuality Himself.” That is true; yet Jesus also commanded us to obey His apostles and His apostles spoke against homosexuality on several occasions: Romans 1:25-28; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.

Since we are here in 1 Corinthians 6, I want you to notice the further context. Apparently some of the Corinthian Christians were under the assumption that because their spirits had been saved by the blood of Christ, then they could do what they wanted to do with their bodies – even engaging in sexual behaviors that God would otherwise forbid (6:13-20).

Our bodies are not our masters. We are not to identify ourselves primarily in terms of our sexuality. We are spirit beings but our bodies belong to Jesus Christ and we are to glorify God in our bodies, which means, among other things, we cannot use our bodies to do sinful things because that affects our spirits as well, which is most important.

Our society wants to say that “self-actualization” – being true to yourself, especially in sexual terms – is the highest good we can attain. But that’s not what Jesus teaches. Our highest good is serving God and that can only be done in the way that God has commanded. And keeping our sexual aspect under control and submissive to the teachings of Christ is a part of that.

Observe 1 Thessalonians 4:1-8.

Jesus tells us that truth makes us free (John 8:32) – His truth, His spiritual realities. When we deny God’s reality in this world, we become slaves to the fake. We confuse our brains and our spirits.

When we become Christians, we become new creatures, the old things have passed away, all things become new – 2 Corinthians 5:17. We recognize a truth that has been truth even before we became Christians, we just didn’t recognize it: The spirit is what is most important and the spirit must be subservient to God and His word.

We simply cannot love ourselves and our sexual identity above what God has told us in His word. Always remember and never forget that “self love” is sinful: 2 Timothy 3:2.

HOW TO RESPOND TO SOMEONE WHO IS CONFUSED ABOUT GOD:

Basically, you respond to someone who is confused about God’s work in the sexual area in the same way you respond to someone engaged in any other sin:

1) Be humble and recognize that you also have some type of sin that you struggle with: Galatians 6:1-2.

2) Be patient as the individual works through their confusion: 2 Timothy 2:24-26.

3) Review with them what God’s word has to say.

4) Don’t over-react to children who might not have the typical interests that a little boy or a little girl might have.

5) Understand and also explain that a boy / girl can have a close relationship with a boy / girl and not be gay / lesbian – just like David and Jonathan (1 Samuel 18:1; 19:1; 20:17; 2 Samuel 1:26).

6) It’s also okay for an individual not to have an interest in the other gender to the extent that he or she does not want to get married.

7) While we know for sure that homosexuality is not caused by some kind of “gay gene” – there is no proof at all – it is also true that we do not know how much our genes influence our choices versus the environment influencing our choices.

8) Nothing causes a man to murder or a man to engage in homosexual behavior. Those are still choices and we are accountable to God for the choices we make.

Our society is confused. The Christian can and should be a voice of reason, love, and patience as he or she shares the truth from God’s word.

Paul Holland

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACHING:

TERTULLIAN

Tertullian was a late second century Christian. Born in the north African Roman providence of Carthage. Some writings suggest that his father was a Roman Centurian. After his conversion to Christianity, He writes that “Christians are made, not born” (Apol., xviii).  His many writings, in both Latin and Koine Greek, defended Christianity against both Judaism and Paganism. During a time of persecution, he wrote perhaps his most famous quote, “”the blood of the Christians is seed” (Apologeticum, 50).

Tertullian opposed infant baptism, believed that laity could baptize, and defended the Lord’s Super as a “symbolic” event. As Christianity continued to rapidly spread across the Roman world he wrote, “Yet we fill your cities, islands, camps, your palace, senate, forum.  We have left you only your temples.”

While many of Tertullian’s writings have been lost, many have survived the centuries.  He is seen as a true defender of the basic teachings of the apostles, during a time of the early apostasy of the church. There has never been an age, a time and place, when we have not needed to defend the teachings of the New Testament. Paul said, “I am appointed for the defense of the gospel” (Philippians 1:16). Let all Christians, you and me, let us all not be afraid to speak up and defend the truth of God’s word.

-Dennis Doughty

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TERTULLIAN

From the Director’s Desk

What would the congregation say about their preacher after he left? What would the church say about the missionaries after they returned home? What about area congregations and Christians – how would they characterize the work of certain ministers? What kind of impact do we as preachers leave on people when our time working together comes to an end?

When we study 1 Thessalonians 1:9-10, we see the kind of impact that Paul, Silas, and Timothy had on their Macedonian brethren. Their reputation was based on observations about the local congregation and the spreading of that news around the area. Preachers and teachers will be judged both in this life and on that Great Day. As those who humbly point people to the Savior, we know that people will observe our lives and our teaching and share those things with others. That is okay. What was noticeable about Paul, Silas, and Timothy and what can we learn about it today?

First, the brethren noticed that their ministry could be characterized by work. The work of the preacher was not a passive one as they had to labor among the brethren (cf. 1 Thess. 2:9). If the preacher is lazy, everyone will know. Second, the brethren recognized that the missionaries were partners with, not lords over the local church. The work of ministers of the gospel is not one of supremacy but servitude, not of position but partnership. Third, their work in Thessalonica was obvious because of the change in the congregation as the members turned from sin to serve God. This change was not in service times nor window dressing; this change was evident in the way the church conducted itself. The change, repentance, was seen in their lives. The work of ministers is not in tinkering with auxiliary matters; it is in delivering a life-changing message week in and week out. Fourth, they preached a message of hope. The gospel, by its nature, condemns man in his sin and illuminates the wrath to come. But, the gospel, by its nature, gives man great hope. When the preacher descends from the pulpit walks away from the podium, or stands up from the kitchen table, he may have delivered a message about sin, but he should certainly leave that place showing people the hope we all have in Jesus.

Trent Kennedy

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on From the Director’s Desk

I can Live with your Disapproval

I realize that I may have to start doing so simply based upon the title above. It is certainly not meant to be dismissive or cavalier. Nor is it meant to be a disrespectful statement of your relative worth as a fellow human. It is, instead, a considered statement of the value system I embrace and the cost I am willing to bear as I uphold that system. Let me explain.

We are to be concerned with the thoughts of others. If nothing else, the Golden Rule would dictate that I treat others in a fair and respectable way (Matt. 7:12). But there are other Biblical reminders of our obligations to treat others appropriately: “He that despiseth [holds in contempt, holds as insignificant – RB] his neighbor sinneth” (Pro. 14:21); “The tongue of the wise useth knowledge aright: (Pro. 15:2); “let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man” (Col. 4:6); “Put them in mind … to speak evil of no man, not to be contentious, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men” (Tit. 3:1-2). So by my title I am not attempting to justify rude or intentionally offensive behavior.

I am, however, bringing to the fore the fact that we are to be most concerned with what God thinks of us and our actions. We need to be concerned with ordering our lives according to His stipulations, irrespective of what others may think of these decisions (Ps. 119:133). As the psalmist said, “Depart from me, ye evildoers: for I will keep the commandments of my God” (Ps. 119:115). Even my own desires are to be subordinated to the wishes of Jehovah, just as Jesus voiced in Mark 14:36, “… nevertheless, not what I will, but what thou wilt.” So my first concern is with pleasing the Lord, not myself, my family, my neighbors, my community, etc. Certainly it is He Who instructs me not to be careless in my dealings with others, as per above, but His will is to be placed first.

Which means that once we have affairs properly ordered in this way, we must continue down the course the Lord dictates regardless of what others think. And if there should be a conflict, I will tell you in advance what decision I will make. “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). And these words were uttered to the Jewish leaders who opposed Peter and the other apostles preaching about Jesus. But God told them to preach. The disapproval of the leaders of the people did not outweigh Peter’s sense of duty to the Lord. When Paul stood before Festus and King Agrippa, making defense of his actions in preaching about Christ, Festus mocked the apostle saying, “Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad” (Acts 26:24). How interesting to note his response – “I am not made, most noble Festus; but speak forth the words of truth and soberness” (26:26). Far from being either disrespectful or cowering, Paul simply stated the truth – he had found a Way not to be denied or regretted. And then he voiced his desire that Agrippa be a Christian also! He did not need their approval; he wanted to win their hearts for Christ!

I can certainly attempt to bridge these gaps in understanding and relations; I need not be purposely callous or rude. My defiance is based upon greater, more sublime principles that reflect a higher calling. It is not predicated upon arrogance or disdain, but a desire to do what is right and, like Paul, seek to help others do the same.

Once again, I do not intend to be careless with your emotions or feelings. However, it is enough for me to know that the Lord is pleased with my course. And I know that those who tend to godly things will also approve my course. For all others, the changes may need to be made in their thoughts and values, not mine, and that is what leads to disapproval. I can live with that.

Rick Brumback

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on I can Live with your Disapproval

The Wisdom to See the End

Every parent works hard to instill within their children the ability to contemplate the outcomes of their words and actions, but such an effort is not always easy. A father tells his little boy to clean up his toys, tell the truth, and follow the rules but often the little boy just wants to know “why?” Parents have something that their children do not—life experience, and with it, wisdom, and foresight. A child may not understand why Mom and Dad have certain rules, but Mom and Dad know that the foundation for good moral and ethical behavior is laid in childhood. A teenager may think his parents are the worst for not allowing him to be out as late as he wants or date whomever he wants, but parents want what is best for their children and possess a kind of wisdom that allows them to see the outcome of an action that their teenager cannot. Often, a parent’s wish is simply that their children might step into their shoes and see things from their perspective. We want our children to see the end result of their actions.

Similarly, the book of Deuteronomy may be viewed as the Father’s final exhortation to a son coming of age. The generation of Israelites to exit Egypt had died in the wilderness and a new generation was now ready to stand in their shoes and cross the Jordan into the Promised Land. Deuteronomy stands as a final exhortation to prepare them for that undertaking. The final stanza of the book is a song which Jehovah gave to Moses, who wrote it and taught it to Israel (Deu. 31:22). The song was to be a permanent witness to the requirements of the covenant and penalty for violating it. Like the historical Psalms, the children of Israel were to sing this song throughout their generations that they may be reminded of the lessons of the past and their responsibilities in the present and future. Embedded within this song is the same desire discussed previously–the desire of a Father for His children to contemplate the consequences of their actions– “O that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end” (Deu. 32:29)!

A study of God’s desire in Deuteronomy 32:29 begins by recognizing Israel’s inability to accomplish it. Though Jehovah wanted them to consider the consequences of their actions they could not because “they are a nation void of counsel, neither is there any understanding in them” (Deu. 32:28). To be “void of counsel” is to lack sense and to have no “understanding” is to have an inability to understand basic truth. In other words, they were senseless! They lacked wisdom and discernment regarding their actions. Famine, destruction, and the sword had all come upon them because of their sinfulness and yet they lacked the wherewithal the recognize that such judgments had come upon them due to their own actions. Jeremiah would say many years later,

Jerusalem hath grievously sinned; therefore she is removed: All that honoured her despise her, because they have seen her nakedness: Yea, she sigheth, and turneth backward. Her filthiness is in her skirts; she remembereth not her last end); Therefore she came down wonderfully: she had no comforter (Lam. 1:8-9).

How tragic that even their enemies could see what they could not (Deu. 32:31).

How does a nation or individual reach the point of being unable to think clearly about their actions? How can one be so senseless? Moses gives three causes: materialism, idolatry, and forgetfulness. Deuteronomy 32:15 says, “But Jeshurun waxed fat, and kicked: Thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered with fatness; Then he forsook God which made him, And lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.” Such is language of materialism. Israel got fat on God’s provision and grace then forgot the source of those blessings and turned their back on Him. Their refusal to recognize and thank God as the source of blessing lead to their idolatry. “They provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, with abominations provoked they him to anger. They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; To gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, Whom your fathers feared not” (Deu. 32:16-17). The only thing left was a complete removal of Jehovah from their minds. “Of the Rock that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee” (Deu. 32:18; cf. Jer. 2:32). This was no incidental slip of the mind like losing a television remote or forgetting to put the trash out. This was a willful removal of the knowledge of Jehovah from their thoughts.

However, God’s desire for them was very different (Deu. 32:29-33). He wanted them to “be wise” and “understand” and “consider.” Wisdom has to do with the correct application of information, foresight, and skillful living. To “understand” is to “be attentive with scrutiny in order to produce wisdom.” To “consider” is to “perceive and to make the best choice.” The Lord wanted them to be able to examine the difficulties they had endured and recognize that the cause for such was their sinful actions. He wanted them to be like the Prodigal who “came to himself” and realized that being a servant in his father’s house was far better than dining with pigs (Luke 15:17-19). The trouble is that Israel had rejected God and to reject God is to reject wisdom–the ability to see life as it truly is! “For the Lord giveth wisdom: out of His mouth cometh knowledge and understanding” (Pro. 2:6).

If one is to clearly see life as it truly is, then one must view life through the lenses of scripture. God’s Word is a lamp and a light (Ps. 119:105). David said, “The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes” (Ps. 19:8). “The commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life” (Pro. 6:23). Had Israel listened to God their vision would have been clear. They would have been wise and able to see their latter end! The same is true for all humanity. But when we reject God and His will and embrace the philosophies and thinking of the world we suffer a very different outcome. We become wise to do evil and ignorant to what is good (Jer. 4:22).  Lack of knowledge breeds destruction (Hos. 4:6) because outside of Jehovah there is no genuine knowledge or direction. The Father wanted Israel, His children, to see where their actions would lead. But, like the Pharisees in the days of Christ (John 9) they could not because they would not.

Cody Westbrook

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Wisdom to See the End

Would You Be Willing to Die for Others? 

That is what Jesus did for us! And, Jesus said that is the greatest love that one could possess. In John 15.13, He said, “Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends.” So, we see from this passage that to lay down our lives for another takes “great love” on our part. Do you have it? Let us consider for whom we might pay the ultimate price.

Would you “lay down your life” for your husband or wife? Now, that might be an “easy” one. I would think that we all should answer that one in the affirmative.

Would you “lay down your life” for your children? Once again, that might be another “easy” one. Surely, any loving parent would do that! So, once again, we would probably answer “yes.”

Would you “lay down your life” for another family member like a brother, sister, uncle, cousin, etc.? Now we may be getting to the point of a tougher decision. But, would you do it?

Would you “lay down your life” for one of your friends? Would the fact that some are closer to you than others affect your decision? What about the more distant ones? Would you die for them?

Would you “lay down your life” for the person in the pew near you? What about those whom you do not know very well? What about those who might not see things exactly the way you do? Would you do it? Would you die for a brother or sister in Christ?

Would you “lay down your life” for a nosey neighbor? For a drunkard down the street? For an inmate in the local jail? For a hitchhiker walking through the city? For someone who killed a person you love? For anyone who is unloving? For a sinner? That is what Jesus did! Oh, to be more like Him!

Think about it!

Kevin Williams

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Would You Be Willing to Die for Others? 

HOW WE GOT THE BIBLE: Dating and Accuracy

Previously we took a brief look at three of the most valuable ancient Bible manuscripts we have today: (1) The Vatican, (2) The Sinaitic, and the (3) Alexandrian. Today we will consider some basics as to how manuscripts in general are dated and how accuracy is determined since there are variations.

DATING MANUSCRIPTS

An important question in this study is: How do we know how old the manuscripts actually are? While only general dates can be ascertained, it might be surprising that we can indeed date them within a general span of time (perhaps within a few decades or so). Here are just a couple factors used to determine the age of an ancient Bible manuscript:

  1. The type of material it is written on. Since writing materials changed through the years, this helps us identify a general time period.
  1. The writing style used gives us more precise information since there are so many aspects to this… capital or lower case letters, whether there are spaces between words or not, how many columns are used, division of paragraphs, the simplicity or complexity of the letters, and much more.

HOW ACCURACY OF MANUSCRIPTS IS DETERMINED

This is a little simplistic but should give you a better idea of how this procedure works.

  1. The older manuscripts are generally preferred over the younger. Since older manuscripts  are in closer proximation to the original writing, it has likely been copied fewer times, thus will generally contain fewer mistakes. Please note that this is a general rule and does not alway hold true.
  2. The shorter manuscript is generally preferred over the longer. Scribes were more likely to insert extra words rather than take them away. This was normally an accidental part of copying the text. A scribe might read the text and then turn to write it and accidentally insert additional words that flow with the thought or perhaps fit in with something he has just written. On other occasions the scribe might mistakenly believe he is correcting a error in the text and actually create his own.
  3. Manuscripts are compared with one another. This is especially beneficial with early manuscripts that were written close to the same time. In doing so, many times errors in the text are easy to identify.

Here is a simplistic example of issues that textual critics have dealt with (this is merely a fabricated example for teaching purposes). Let’s suppose we are working with the three following groupings of a total of eight manuscripts, and we are seeking to determine the original wording.

  1. Manuscript No. 1 reads: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was God, and the Word was God.”
  2. Manuscript Numbers 2-5 all read, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.”
  3. Manuscript Numbers 6-8 all say, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God at creation, and the Word was God.”

Now, how would you determine what the original text says? What do you suppose happened with some of the manuscripts you believe to be incorrect? Why can we not necessarily just count which rendering has the most number of manuscripts? What very significant piece or pieces of information have not been provided concerning these manuscripts? If you are unable to figure this out, take a look back at this lesson.

Daren Schroeder

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on HOW WE GOT THE BIBLE: Dating and Accuracy

The Magic of Words

The famous movie star, Bette Davis, at the end of her career, was asked what her favorite line was from her many movies. She said it was from the movie Cabin in the Cotton. In this old black and white film, the youthful Miss Davis told a handsome young suitor, “I’d love to kiss you, but I just washed my hair.” This line helped launch her career.

Words are magical.  When they are connected just right, mixed and matched with precision, they can bring laughter or tears. Words captivate the heart, convey great thoughts, and leave lasting impressions.  A single sentence can change a life, affect history, or launch a career.  Great words become inscriptions that engrave themselves into one’s soul.

Christians must understand the power of their words. Each sentence must be measured, “quick to hear, slow to speak” (Jms. 1:19) as they can dissolve anger or stir up wrath (Pr. 15:1). The tongue “is a fire” that can praise or curse (Jms. 3:6,10). Solomon marveled, “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver” (Pr. 25:11). Your words will be remembered long after you are gone.  Choose them wisely.

– Dennis Doughty.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Magic of Words